<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[driver - Gordon Law Group, LLP]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/tags/driver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/tags/driver/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2025 19:32:04 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[California Judge to Decide Whether Uber Drivers Are Employees or Independent Contractors]]></title>
                <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/california-judge-to-decide-whether-uber-drivers-are-employees-or-independent-contractors/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/california-judge-to-decide-whether-uber-drivers-are-employees-or-independent-contractors/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:41:19 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[driver]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[independent contractor]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[misclassificaion]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uber]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Uber is more popular than ever in large American cities, but a serious question exists: are Uber drivers employees or independent contractors? One California judge with several Uber cases on his docket may be on the verge of answering that question. Two of the cases currently before the judge include: In June of 2015, the&nbsp;New&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Uber is more popular than ever in large American cities, but a serious question exists: are Uber drivers employees or independent contractors? One California judge with several Uber cases on his docket may be on the verge of answering that question.</p>



<p>Two of the cases currently before the judge include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>An accusation that Uber’s background check policies violate the Fair Credit reporting Act; and</li>



<li>An accusation that the company did not give drivers an appropriate share of tips collected.</li>
</ul>



<p>In June of 2015, the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/18/business/uber-contests-california-labor-ruling-that-says-drivers-should-be-employees.html?_r=0">New York Times</a> reported on the California Labor Commissioner’s Office determination that one Uber driver was rightfully classified as an employee and not an independent contractor. The ride share company may have to pay the driver more than $4,000. The Commissioner’s determination only applies to a single case, and Uber is appealing the decision. Company representatives point to decisions in Georgia, Pennsylvania and Texas where drivers were formally classified as independent contractors. On the other side of the issue, the state of Florida recently classified a former Uber driver as an employee for the purpose of claiming unemployment benefits.&nbsp; Though the classification of these drivers remains uncertain, this dispute is likely far from over.</p>



<p>If you have any questions about the classifications of employee and independent contractor, <a href="/contact-us/">contact</a><a href="/contact-us/"> us</a> today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Live and Work as a Driver in New York?]]></title>
                <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/live-and-work-as-a-driver-in-new-york/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/live-and-work-as-a-driver-in-new-york/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:52:22 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[driver]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[independent contractor]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Live and work as a driver in New York? Independent contractors working in New York recently received the benefits of Massachusetts law. A Massachusetts Court just ruled that people who live and work in New York, but are employed by a Massachusetts company with a Massachusetts contract, can bring an action against their employer based&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Live and work as a driver in New York? Independent contractors working in New York recently received the benefits of Massachusetts law. A Massachusetts Court just ruled that people who live and work in New York, but are employed by a Massachusetts company with a Massachusetts contract, can bring an action against their employer based upon the favorable Massachusetts Independent Contractor Statute.</p>



<p>The recent case, <em>Taylor v. Eastern Connection Operating, Inc.</em>, saw drivers seeking compensation for misclassification, as the employer treated their drivers as independent contractors rather than employees. That may have posed a possible problem for the drivers under New York law, but Eastern Connection is a Massachusetts based firm. And, while the three plaintiffs were New York residents and worked in New York, their contract provided for Massachusetts law. With that in mind, the Supreme Judicial Court decided that the Massachusetts Wage Act would apply. While the Court did not rule on whether they were employees or independent contractors, the decision will likely greatly expand the liability of Massachusetts-based companies who have both independent contractors and employees out-of-state.</p>



<p>If you are a driver working as an independent contractor, contact us to learn your rights. Most significantly, if you’re required to pay the costs of operating your truck – insurance, gas, repairs, paint, equipment – you may be entitled to all of it back, with triple damages. Call us today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>