<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[executive policy - Gordon Law Group, LLP]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/tags/executive-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/tags/executive-policy/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 07:06:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Another Attack on CEO Pay]]></title>
                <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/another-attack-on-ceo-pay/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/another-attack-on-ceo-pay/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:38:10 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[executive compensation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[executive policy]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[executives]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[fannie mae]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[freddie mac]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[pay levels]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The salaries of top executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are under attack with the introduction of a new Congressional bill. Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., is sponsoring legislation that would potentially cap executive salaries within these two companies, making them comparable to the salaries of officials within the government’s executive branch. This move is&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The salaries of top executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are under attack with the introduction of a new Congressional bill. Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., is sponsoring legislation that would potentially cap executive salaries within these two companies, making them comparable to the salaries of officials within the government’s executive branch. This move is in response to possible pay increases that are currently under consideration by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director Melvin Watt, who serves as the ultimate conservator for the two agencies.</p>



<p>In 2011, the highest earning executive at Fannie Mae reportedly made $5.3 million, while Freddie Mac’s top executive earned $3.8 million. In 2012, the former FHFA director substantially decreased their annual pay to $600,000.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-the-argument-for-increases"><strong>The argument for increases</strong></h2>



<p>According to Watt, salary increases will help attract top talent to opportunities with&nbsp;<a href="http://www.freddiemac.com/">Freddie Mac</a> and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.fanniemae.com/portal/index.html">Fannie Mae</a>, as well as retain these individuals as employees. He is reportedly allowing Freddie Mac executives to submit a report regarding desired increases for CEO salaries.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The argument against increases</strong></h2>



<p>In response to Watt’s consideration of the issue, Royce responded, “I’m deeply disappointed with Director Watt’s decision to open the door to multi-million dollar salaries at the GSEs, which continue to be propped up by tax payers.”</p>



<p>Under Royce’s legislation, the CEO salaries could reportedly decrease to around $200,000. He is joined in his opposition to the increases by other members of Congress, as well as the Treasury Department.&nbsp; Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are currently under a government conservatorship, which was formed under the 2008 bailout, where the two companies received a combined total of $187 billion. At that time, they were placed under the supervision of the FHFA.</p>



<p>If you have questions about your salary or this proposed legislation,&nbsp;<a href="/contact-us/">contact</a> our office to speak with a trained attorney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Proposed Legislation Would See More Employees Eligible for Overtime]]></title>
                <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/proposed-legislation-would-see-more-employees-eligible-for-overtime/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/proposed-legislation-would-see-more-employees-eligible-for-overtime/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:20:07 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[executive compensation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[executive policy]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[executives]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[highly-compensated employees]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[overtime]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[wages]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>New legislation has been proposed that would increase the minimum salary basis level that employers need to pay as part of the requirements to avoid the overtime rules. Workers classified as executive, administrative or professional employees would have their weekly minimum pay more than doubled, and the floor for highly-compensated employees will increase too, by&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://www.congress.gov/legislation">New legislation</a> has been proposed that would increase the minimum salary basis level that employers need to pay as part of the requirements to avoid the overtime rules. Workers classified as executive, administrative or professional employees would have their weekly minimum pay more than doubled, and the floor for highly-compensated employees will increase too, by 25%.</p>



<p>The U.S. Department of Labor is reviewing new legislation to change overtime salary limits.</p>



<p>Right now, exempt executive, admin, and professional workers must earn at least <strong>$455 per week</strong>. This minimum lets employers skip overtime pay. But this may soon change. U.S. Department of Labor wants to raise the weekly salary floor in stages.</p>



<p>The plan may look like this:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Week salary minimum rises to $1,090</strong></li>



<li><strong>Salary will double for exempt job types</strong></li>



<li><strong>Overtime must be paid if salary falls below the limit</strong></li>
</ul>



<p>This rise may roll out over <strong>3 years</strong>. Employers won’t be able to avoid overtime rules unless they meet the new minimum pay level.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-changes-for-highly-compensated-workers">Changes for Highly-Compensated Workers</h2>



<p>The legislation also affects highly-paid roles.</p>



<p>The yearly salary exemption may rise to <strong>$125,000</strong>. This shifts from the current <strong>$100,000</strong>. The new limit may also adjust for inflation in the future. This keeps the floor updated over time.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Who Is Affected by This Legislation?</h2>



<p>The proposal targets these job groups:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Executive employees</li>



<li>Administrative employees</li>



<li>Professional employees</li>



<li>Highly‑compensated employees</li>
</ul>



<p>If these workers earn below the new minimum, then overtime rules will apply. Employers must pay extra hours worked over 40 per week.</p>



<p>If you have any questions about the legislation or any other overtime questions, <a href="/contact-us/">contact us</a> today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[ISS Changes Methodology for Calculating Relative Degree of Alignment]]></title>
                <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/iss-changes-methodology-for-calculating-relative-degree-of-alignment/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/iss-changes-methodology-for-calculating-relative-degree-of-alignment/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2014 00:47:46 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[employee tips]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[executive compensation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[executive policy]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>ISS (International Shareholder Services Inc.) has released its 2014 U.S. Policy updates, with a modification to the executive compensation section, changing the methodology of how they calculate the Relative Degree of Alignment (RDA). International Shareholder Services Inc. updated how it calculates the Relative Degree of Alignment (RDA). RDA measures CEO pay and performance against peer&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>ISS (International Shareholder Services Inc.) has released its <a href="http://www.issgovernance.com/files/2014USPolicyUpdates.pdf">2014 U.S. Policy updates</a>, with a modification to the executive compensation section, changing the methodology of how they calculate the Relative Degree of Alignment (RDA).</p>



<p>International Shareholder Services Inc. updated how it calculates the Relative Degree of Alignment (RDA). RDA measures CEO pay and performance against peer companies. The 2014 policy now compares 3-year total shareholder return (TSR) rank to 3-year total CEO pay rank within the same peer group. The update aims to make pay scoring clearer and more stable.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-old-vs-new-rda-calculation-method"><strong>Old vs New RDA Calculation Method</strong></h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Old method:</strong> Used 1-year and 3-year TSR vs pay ranks, weighted 40% and 60%.</li>



<li><strong>New method:</strong> Uses <strong>only 3-year</strong> TSR vs pay rank for a smoother, simpler score.<br>The core comparison remains the same. The biggest change is removing the 1-year scoring weight.</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-why-this-update-matters"><strong>Why This Update Matters</strong></h3>



<p>The update supports a growing shift toward long-term rewards. It reduces focus on short results. It encourages companies to align CEO pay with durable peer performance. Many experts say steady metrics build better investor trust. Long-term incentives also lower pay volatility. Companies that reward lasting wins show stronger governance signals.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-agreement-and-effective-date"><strong>Agreement and Effective Date</strong></h3>



<p>The 2014 U.S. policy changes were approved on <strong>November 21, 2013</strong>. They applied to shareholder meetings from <strong>February 1, 2014</strong> onward. This includes proxy review, pay alignment scoring, and investor vote guidance. The rules continue to influence executive <a href="/contact-us/">compensation</a> debates linked to shareholder value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>