<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[New York - Gordon Law Group, LLP]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/tags/new-york/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/tags/new-york/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 22:33:56 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[New York State Minimum Wage Increase Takes Effect]]></title>
                <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/new-york-state-minimum-wage-increase-takes-effect/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/new-york-state-minimum-wage-increase-takes-effect/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 00:30:55 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[employee's rights]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[employment laws]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[minimum wage]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The state of New York implemented a meaningful minimum wage increase on December 31, 2015, following updated state legislation. This law directly improved pay for many hourly employees, especially workers in service and tipped roles. The minimum wage increased from $8.75 to $9.00 per hour, placing New York $1.75 above the federal minimum wage of&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The state of New York implemented a meaningful minimum wage increase on December 31, 2015, following updated state legislation. This law directly improved pay for many hourly employees, especially workers in service and tipped roles. The minimum wage increased from <strong>$8.75 to $9.00 per hour</strong>, placing New York <strong>$1.75 above the federal minimum wage of $7.25</strong>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-who-was-most-affected"><strong>Who Was Most Affected?</strong></h3>



<p>The minimum wage increase mainly supported lower-paid professionals including:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Retail and store workers</li>



<li>Manual laborers and shift workers</li>



<li>Customer service teams</li>



<li>Service professionals receiving tips</li>



<li>Food and hospitality staff</li>
</ul>



<p>Although this rise may sound small, it set the foundation for future wage reforms and created immediate payroll adjustments for both employers and employees.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-major-reforms-for-tipped-service-advisors-and-service-workers"><strong>Major Reforms for Tipped Service Advisors and Service Workers</strong></h3>



<p>Service staff, especially in food and automobile-related shops, often rely on tip income. Employers can apply a <strong>tip credit</strong>, allowing them to pay a lower hourly base so long as tips compensate the difference to reach minimum wage. However, lawmakers restricted how large this credit could be.</p>



<p>For service employers and restaurants, the maximum tip credit was reduced:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>From $3.50 per hour</strong></li>



<li><strong>To $1.50 per hour</strong></li>
</ul>



<p>As result, the required minimum base pay for tipped workers rose:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>From $5.00 per hour</strong></li>



<li><strong>To $7.50 per hour</strong></li>
</ul>



<p>This shift ensured tipped employees received a stronger guaranteed hourly component, regardless of customer volume or slow business days.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-overtime-wage-impact"><strong>Overtime Wage Impact</strong></h3>



<p>Both federal and state law mandate that overtime must be paid at <strong>1.5× hourly rate</strong>. Based on the new $9.00 minimum wage, the updated 2015 overtime rate became:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>$13.50 per hour</strong>, up from $13.13</li>
</ul>



<p>Even though the DOL announced that withdrawal did not change legal responsibilities, many automotive and food employers had to revisit payroll calculations, overtime approval processes, and worker classification assumptions.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-workplace-classification-still-matters"><strong>Workplace Classification Still Matters</strong></h3>



<p>Interpretations from agencies like the United States Department of Labor shaped employer policy for years. Still, courts now rely more on job duties than old handbook references. Employers using outdated assumptions may face pay misclassification claims.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-what-employers-must-do-now"><strong>What Employers Must Do Now</strong></h3>



<p>To maintain compliance and avoid liability, companies should update:</p>



<p>Dispute-resolution strategy with legal support</p>



<p>Pay benchmarking systems</p>



<p>Tipped worker payroll models</p>



<p>Overtime calculations</p>



<p>Internal wage-classification reviews</p>



<p>If you have questions about New York’s new minimum wage rate, <a href="/contact-us/">contact</a> our office to speak with an experienced attorney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[New York Expands Discrimination Protection]]></title>
                <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/new-york-expands-discrimination-protection/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/new-york-expands-discrimination-protection/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:27:12 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[cuomo]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[new york human rights commission]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[new york labor law]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[sexual harassment]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In October 2015, the state of New York reshaped its employment law framework by dramatically expanding discrimination protections for workers and job applicants. The legislative package, signed by Governor Andrew Cuomo, strengthened employer obligations under key sections of the state’s New York State Human Rights Law. These changes were widely seen as response to evolving&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>In October 2015, the state of New York reshaped its employment law framework by dramatically expanding discrimination protections for workers and job applicants. The legislative package, signed by Governor Andrew Cuomo, strengthened employer obligations under key sections of the state’s <a href="https://share.google/XGSqxHGMNaAcYF5qw">New York State Human Rights Law</a>.</p>



<p>These changes were widely seen as response to evolving workforce needs, demographic shifts, caregiver responsibility growth, and rising workplace discrimination claims nationwide.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-new-york-key-bills-that-increased-worker-protections"><strong>New York</strong> <strong>Key Bills That Increased Worker Protections</strong></h3>



<p>The new legislation targeted enforcement gaps, ambiguous legal language, and accommodation loopholes affecting smaller workplaces. Here are five of most notable updates:</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-1-sexual-harassment-protections-now-cover-all-employers"><strong>1. Sexual Harassment Protections Now Cover All Employers</strong></h3>



<p>Previously, companies with <strong>fewer than 4 employees were exempt</strong> under the human rights statute. Now, <strong>all employers in New York are covered in sexual harassment cases</strong>, regardless of workforce size. This means:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>No more minimum-employee exemptions for harassment claims</li>



<li>Protection applies to interns, contractors, hourly staff, and small-business workers</li>



<li>Covers hostile environment and retaliation cases when harassment reported</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-2-pay-equity-law-strengthened-with-clearer-language"><strong>2. Pay Equity Law Strengthened With Clearer Language</strong></h3>



<p>The equal pay statute was updated to correct a long-debated phrase: <strong>“any factor other than sex.”</strong> The new law now requires <strong>“a bona fide factor other than sex”</strong> such as:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Education, verified training, or industry certification</li>



<li>Demonstrated experience in similar job duties</li>



<li>Licensed or accredited role-specific skill requirements</li>
</ul>



<p>This change makes pay decisions more defensible while preventing vague salary exceptions.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-3-familial-status-becomes-a-protected-category"><strong>3. Familial Status Becomes a Protected Category</strong></h3>



<p>For first time, <strong>familial status joins protected categories</strong> under New York’s Human Rights Law. This covers discrimination tied to:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Being parent or primary caregiver</li>



<li>Supporting dependent family members</li>



<li>Denial of opportunity due to household responsibility assumptions</li>
</ul>



<p>This reform aligned statute more closely with modern workforce households.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-4-legal-remedies-expanded-but-only-for-sex-based-discrimination"><strong>4. Legal Remedies Expanded But Only for Sex-Based Discrimination</strong></h3>



<p>Under new rules, <strong>attorney’s fees may now be awarded as damages</strong> in <strong>sex-based discrimination cases only</strong>. In other forms of discrimination, fee awards are still not permitted. This means:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Higher chance of obtaining counsel for gender discrimination cases</li>



<li>Stronger deterrent for pay and hiring bias by employers</li>



<li>More complete remedies for victims with imbalance bargaining power</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-5-pregnancy-discrimination-must-be-treated-as-temporary-disability"><strong>5. Pregnancy Discrimination Must Be Treated as Temporary Disability</strong></h3>



<p>Employers are now required to provide reasonable accommodations for pregnancy-related conditions — as long as worker can perform job duties in “reasonable manner.” Covered accommodations include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Temporary removal from hazardous work</li>



<li>Modified manual labor duty requirements</li>



<li>Rest breaks when medically justified</li>



<li>Workstation or schedule adjustments</li>
</ul>



<p>Employees must verify condition with documentation. Once notice provided, employers must begin interactive accommodation discussions   or risk liability.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-challenges-employers-now-face"><strong>Challenges Employers Now Face</strong></h3>



<p>Even companies with structured HR analytics may struggle applying inferences fairly. Courts now favor <strong>job-duty based analysis</strong>, documented reasoning, and transparent compensation benchmarking. Companies failing update policies may face claims tied to:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Hiring bias</li>



<li>Pay inequity</li>



<li>Retaliation after internal reports</li>



<li>Disparate impact from automated screening criteria</li>
</ul>



<p>For questions or concerns about this new legislation, <a href="/contact-us/">contact</a> our office to speak with an attorney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[New York Releases Regulations Governing Use of Payroll Debit Cards]]></title>
                <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/new-york-releases-regulations-governing-use-of-payroll-debit-cards/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/new-york-releases-regulations-governing-use-of-payroll-debit-cards/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 00:01:48 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[debit cards]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[employee rights]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[payroll]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>New York recently joined the growing number of states that allow employers to pay workers with payroll debit cards. Instead of a paper check or direct deposit into a banking account, wages are placed on a payroll card for the employee to use at his leisure. Prior to this new legislation, direct deposit was the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>New York recently joined the growing number of states that allow employers to pay workers with payroll debit cards. Instead of a paper check or direct deposit into a banking account, wages are placed on a payroll card for the employee to use at his leisure.</p>



<p>Prior to this new legislation, direct deposit was the method of payment expressly mentioned under&nbsp;<a href="https://labor.ny.gov/formsdocs/wp/LS445.pdf">New York State labor laws</a>. Many employers interpreted the regulations to include payroll debit cards, even without any express language on the issue. Employers find this payment method attractive because it costs less than producing a paper check, which is often the only available payment method for the growing number of workers without a traditional bank account. But, it is a system prime for rampant abuse and problems.</p>



<p>The New York Attorney General’s Office previously opined that payroll debit cards were an expensive option for the employees who use them, due to high ATM costs and other fees. &nbsp;To counter this problem, the new legislation mandates that:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Payment on a debit card is only allowed with voluntary consent from workers; and</li>



<li>There must be at least at least one ATM network that charges no fees for access to the money.</li>
</ul>



<p>Legislators hope that the new changes will clear up any confusion about the use of payroll debit cards and protect the interests of employees.</p>



<p>If you have questions about payroll regulations,&nbsp;<a href="/contact-us/">contact</a> our office to speak with an attorney today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[New York City Banning Use of Credit History in Employment Decisions]]></title>
                <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/new-york-city-banning-use-of-credit-history-in-employment-decisions/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/new-york-city-banning-use-of-credit-history-in-employment-decisions/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 23:58:16 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[credit history]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[new york city]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>New York City has enacted a major amendment to its Human Rights Law, banning employers from using credit history to make hiring, pay, or promotion decisions. This legislative shift is driven by the Stop Credit Discrimination in Employment Act, which officially took effect on September 3, 2015 in NYC Credit. For many years, companies relied&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://share.google/JXCEoU6mKgX80ALCg">New York City</a> has enacted a major amendment to its Human Rights Law, banning employers from using credit history to make hiring, pay, or promotion decisions. This legislative shift is driven by the Stop Credit Discrimination in Employment Act, which officially took effect on <strong>September 3, 2015</strong> in NYC Credit.</p>



<p>For many years, companies relied on credit scores, credit reports, late payments, charged-off debt, bankruptcies, and account details to filter job candidates or evaluate internal staff. Studies and class-wide discrimination claims have repeatedly demonstrated that this practice disproportionately impacts <strong>minority groups, lower-income households, women, caregivers, immigrants, students, and traditionally under-represented applicants</strong>. Critics argue that credit reports measure financial history not job performance or workplace risk.</p>



<p>The <a href="http://legistar.council.nyc.gov/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=1709692&GUID=61CC4810-E9ED-4F16-A765-FD1D190CEE6C">provision</a> was added as an amendment to the city’s Human Rights Law and goes into effect on September 3, 2015.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-what-counts-as-nyc-credit-history-under-the-ban"><strong>What Counts as NYC Credit History Under the Ban</strong></h2>



<p>Under the law, the term <strong>credit history includes</strong>:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Credit scores and credit reports</strong></li>



<li><strong>Late or missed payments</strong></li>



<li><strong>Collection accounts</strong></li>



<li><strong>Bankruptcy filings</strong></li>



<li><strong>Civil judgments</strong></li>



<li><strong>Charged-off or settled debt</strong></li>



<li><strong>Details about active credit accounts</strong></li>
</ul>



<p>If your employer asks for this information for a non-exempt role, you have legal grounds to decline.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Employer Exceptions Still Allowed</strong></h2>



<p>The law does provide <strong>limited exceptions</strong>, where credit history may still be screened. The role must fall into one of these categories:</p>



<p>✔ Positions where <strong>federal or state law requires credit review</strong><br>✔ <strong>Law enforcement roles or criminal justice positions</strong><br>✔ Jobs requiring <strong>public trust-based background checks</strong><br>✔ <strong>State or federal security clearance roles</strong><br>✔ Positions with authority over <strong>$10,000+ in assets or spending control</strong><br>✔ Non-clerical roles with access to <strong>trade secrets or national intelligence</strong></p>



<p>For all other roles, credit history is <strong>legally off-limits for workplace decision-making</strong>.</p>



<p>This legislation is largely considered pro-employee and workers should keep it in mind when employers ask for their credit histories. If employees believe that they have been illegally discriminated against based on a credit history issue, they can&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nyc.gov/html/cchr/html/complaint/filing-complaint.shtml">file a complaint</a> with the New York Commission on Human Rights or file suit against the employer, which can lead to the payment of compensatory damages.</p>



<p>One of our attorneys, Philip Gordon has testified before the House and Senate’s Joint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development in favor of similar laws here in Massachusetts.</p>



<p>If you have any questions about this legislation or if you have faced credit or background checks in your employment,&nbsp;<a href="/contact-us/">contact</a> us today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[New Overtime Regulations Under Review]]></title>
                <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/new-overtime-regulations-under-review/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/new-overtime-regulations-under-review/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 23:51:22 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[credit history]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[new york city]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Proposed revisions to Section 13(a)(1) of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act are coming under scrutiny as some question the Department of Labor’s (DOL) authority to create legislation. U.S. Secretary of Labor Thomas Perez recently announced that the agency submitted a proposal to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that will potentially affect the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Proposed revisions to Section 13(a)(1) of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act are coming under scrutiny as some question the Department of Labor’s (DOL) authority to create legislation. U.S. Secretary of Labor Thomas Perez recently announced that the agency submitted a proposal to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that will potentially affect the number of employees who are eligible to receive overtime pay under federal labor policies.</p>



<p>The&nbsp;<a href="http://www.dol.gov/elaws/esa/flsa/overtime/info.htm">current legislation</a> exempts certain classes of workers from receiving overtime pay, even if they work more than 40 hours within a single workweek. The exemption currently applies to workers who are paid a salary of at least $455 per week. In addition, the employee must perform certain types of work, also known as the “duties” test.&nbsp; While the exact exemption that applies to individual jobs vary, the types of factors to look for include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Management of the business;</li>



<li>Control over individuals;</li>



<li>Substantial decision making authority;</li>



<li>Work that requires specialized academic instruction or training;</li>



<li>Work that is done in the field of computer technology;</li>



<li>Work that includes sales made away from the employer’s place of business; and/or</li>



<li>Work in a recognized artistic or creative field.</li>
</ul>



<p>Though the proposed changes are yet to be reviewed, proponents argue that is the responsibility of Congress to determine if changes are appropriate and make them, and not the executive branch. If the OMB approves the submission, the DOL will release the proposed changes for public review and comment.</p>



<p>If you have any questions about overtime exemptions, <a href="/contact-us/">contact us</a> today for a free case evaluation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Understanding New York’s Sick Time Law]]></title>
                <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/understanding-new-yorks-sick-time-law/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/understanding-new-yorks-sick-time-law/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:57:20 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[earned sick time]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[paid sick leave]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[sick leave]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[sick time]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Starting today, the New York City Sick Leave Law states that employees working more than 80 hours per calendar year are entitled to receive&nbsp;sick leave for the care of themselves or family members. The law includes&nbsp;domestic workers, which are individuals who work inside their employer’s home caring for children, or performing housekeeping duties. Relatives of&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Starting today, the New York City Sick Leave Law states that employees working more than 80 hours per calendar year are entitled to receive&nbsp;<a href="http://www1.nyc.gov/site/dca/about/paid-sick-leave-what-employers-need-to-know.page">sick leave</a> for the care of themselves or family members. The law includes&nbsp;<a href="http://www1.nyc.gov/site/dca/about/paid-sick-leave-domestic-workers.page">domestic workers</a>, which are individuals who work inside their employer’s home caring for children, or performing housekeeping duties. Relatives of the employer and casual workers are not covered.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-the-law-s-details"><strong>The Law’s Details</strong></h2>



<p>Employers of one domestic worker are subject to the following provisions:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Employees must work with the employer for at least one year;</li>



<li>Employees must work at least 80 hours per calendar year; and</li>



<li>Employees are entitled to receive two paid sick days at their regular rate of at minimum wage.</li>
</ul>



<p>Employers of one to four employees are subject to these provisions:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Employees must work at least 80 hours per calendar year; and</li>



<li>Employees are entitled to up to 40 hours of unpaid sick leave.</li>
</ul>



<p>Employers of five or more employees are subject to these provisions:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Employees must work at least 80 hours per calendar year; and</li>



<li>Employees are entitled to receive up to 40 hours of paid sick leave at their regular rate of at least minimum wage.</li>
</ul>



<p>Employers must give written notifications describing the rights of the employee. Employers should include information about the employee’s right to file a complaint with the Department of Consumer Affairs, without fear of retaliation.</p>



<p>If you have any questions about the legislation or any other sick leave questions, <a href="/contact-us/">contact us</a> today</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>