<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[non-competition agreements - Gordon Law Group, LLP]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/tags/non-competition-agreements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/tags/non-competition-agreements/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 11:50:56 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Are Anti-Raiding Agreements Enforceable under the new Non-Competition Agreement Act?]]></title>
                <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/are-anti-raiding-agreements-enforceable-under-the-new-non-competition-agreement-act/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/are-anti-raiding-agreements-enforceable-under-the-new-non-competition-agreement-act/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 02:17:03 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[best employment lawyer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[non-compete law]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[non-competition agreements]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[noncompete]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Massachusetts updated its rules on job restrictions. Specifically, a new act began on October 1, 2018. The goal was to guide fair non-compete terms. However, the law did not cover every agreement. What the Act Covers and What It Does Not The new act focuses on classic non-compete contracts. Yet, it excludes several common restrictions.&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://share.google/vMTGRLxgexQOGmtFd">Massachusetts</a> updated its rules on job restrictions. <strong>Specifically</strong>, a new act began on October 1, 2018. The goal was to guide fair non-compete terms. <strong>However</strong>, the law did not cover every agreement.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-what-the-act-covers-and-what-it-does-not"><strong>What the Act Covers and What It Does Not</strong></h2>



<p>The new act focuses on classic non-compete contracts. <strong>Yet</strong>, it excludes several common restrictions. For example, it does <strong>not apply to</strong>:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>non‑solicitation agreements</li>



<li>confidentiality agreements</li>



<li><a href="https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/nda.asp">NDAs</a></li>



<li>invention assignment agreements</li>
</ul>



<p><strong>Additionally</strong>, it does not apply when a business is sold. <strong>Especially</strong> if the restricted person owns part of that business. <strong>Moreover</strong>, the act excludes owners who receive major payment from the sale.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>A Key Court Decision That Defined Anti-Raiding Rules</strong></h2>



<p><strong>Later</strong>, on January 14, 2020, the top state court evaluated anti-raiding terms again. The case involved a dealership group. The court reviewed a restriction that blocked a former exec from hiring staff for six months.</p>



<p>The court outlined a clear test. <strong>Namely</strong>, a restriction is reasonable when it:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li>Protects a real business interest</li>



<li>Has a fair time limit</li>



<li>Serves public interest</li>



<li>Uses limited space rules</li>
</ol>



<p><strong>Importantly</strong>, the court treated this as part of a business sale. <strong>Because of that</strong>, it applied lighter review. <strong>As a result</strong>, the court enforced the six-month rule.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why Business Sale Agreements Face Less Criticism</strong></h2>



<p>Business sale restrictions face lower scrutiny than employee contracts. <strong>Still</strong>, the law checks if the rule protects real interests. It checks if the limit is fair. It also checks if the public is protected.</p>



<p><strong>In contrast</strong>, employers face stricter review when restricting workers. <strong>But</strong>, reviewing owner restrictions is different. <strong>Because</strong>, courts expect owners to negotiate with more balance. <strong>Therefore</strong>, owner agreements are judged less harshly.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Anti-Raiding Agreements Today</strong></h2>



<p>Anti-raiding clauses can be enforced after a business sale. <strong>Provided that</strong>, they protect real interests. <strong>Likewise</strong>, the time must stay short. The space must stay reasonable. The public must stay protected.</p>



<p><strong>In simple terms</strong>, the law allows short anti-raiding limits for business owners. It allows them if a business is sold. It allows them if the rule stays fair. <strong>So, ultimately</strong>, the court prefers balance, not punishment.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What This Means for Employees and Owners</strong></h2>



<p>Employees should learn contract impact early. <strong>Similarly</strong>, owners must check long-term career effects. Restrictions can block hiring. They can also block future business plans. <strong>That is why</strong>, legal advice matters before signing anything.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How Gordon Law Group, LLP Can Help</strong></h2>



<p><a href="/home/">Gordon Law Group, LLP</a> supports workers and business owners. <strong>Specifically</strong>, the firm reviews restrictive contracts. It explains future risks. It protects career rights. It also protects fair competition. Boston MA employment lawyer.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Final Reminder</strong></h2>



<p>Contact a lawyer before signing restrictions. <strong>Because</strong>, unclear contracts can damage careers. They can also limit business growth. <strong>Therefore</strong>, you should act early. You should ask questions early. You should protect your future early.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[New Massachusetts Noncompetition Agreement Act]]></title>
                <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/new-massachusetts-noncompetition-agreement-act/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/new-massachusetts-noncompetition-agreement-act/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 02:17:39 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[best employment lawyer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[massachusetts]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[non-compete law]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[non-competition agreements]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>On October 1, 2018, the Non- Competition Agreement Act went into effect in Massachusetts.&nbsp; This law applies to all noncompetition agreements (“agreements”) entered into by employers and employees or independent contractors in Massachusetts on or after October 1, 2018.&nbsp; This new law does not apply to non-solicitation agreements, nondisclosure or confidentiality agreements, or invention assignment&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>On October 1, 2018, the Non- Competition Agreement Act went into effect in Massachusetts.&nbsp; This law applies to all noncompetition agreements (“agreements”) entered into by employers and employees or independent contractors in Massachusetts on or after October 1, 2018.&nbsp; This new law does not apply to non-solicitation agreements, nondisclosure or confidentiality agreements, or invention assignment agreements.&nbsp; This law also does not apply to noncompetition agreements made in connection with the sale of a business entity, where the party restricted by the agreement is a significant owner (member/partner) who will receive significant consideration from the sale.</p>



<p>While this law is set out in its entirety at M.G.L. c. 149, § 24L, the following are a few provisions of note for employees:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>If the agreement is entered into prior to the start of employment, it must be in writing, signed by both parties, and provided to the employee at the formal offer of employment or 10 business days prior to the start of employment;</li>



<li>If the agreement is entered into during employment, it must be supported by fair and reasonable consideration other than continued employment;</li>



<li>The agreement must not be broader than necessary to protect the employer’s trade secrets, confidential information or goodwill;</li>



<li>The restricted period must not exceed 12 months from the end of employment in most cases;</li>



<li>The agreement must be reasonable in geographic reach, or limited to the geographical area where the employee provided services in the last 2 years of employment;</li>



<li>The agreement must be reasonable in scope, or limited to the types of services provided by the employee in the last 2 years of employment;</li>



<li>The agreement must be supported by a garden leave clause in most cases, where the employee receives payment of at least 50% of his/her highest annualized base salary paid withing the last 2 years of employment;</li>



<li>There can be no agreements with non-exempt employees, under-graduate/graduate students in internships, employees that were terminated without cause or laid off, and employees under the age of 18.</li>



<li>The agreement can not contain a choice of law provision that would avoid the requirements set forth by the new law.</li>
</ul>



<p>Before signing any agreement, it is important to understand the effects that agreement may have on your future ability to obtain employment. Contact us if you have any questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>