<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[paycheck fairness act - Gordon Law Group, LLP]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/tags/paycheck-fairness-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/tags/paycheck-fairness-act/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 22:30:35 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Paycheck Fairness Act Blocked]]></title>
                <link>https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/paycheck-fairness-act-blocked/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.gordonllp.com/blog/paycheck-fairness-act-blocked/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:43:31 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[equal pay]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[paycheck fairness act]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Last Wednesday April 9th, saw the House Republicans vote against the Paycheck Fairness Act—a bill proposed to achieve equal pay. This was the third time the bill had been blocked. The bill specifically intends to shorten the number of reasons a company can cite for paying women less than men. As we wrote about in&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Last Wednesday April 9<sup>th</sup>, saw the House Republicans vote against the Paycheck Fairness Act—a bill proposed to achieve equal pay. This was the third time the bill had been blocked. The bill specifically intends to shorten the number of reasons a company can cite for paying women less than men.</p>



<p>As we <a href="/blog/women-still-earning-less-than-men/">wrote about</a> in February, women still make just 77 cents for every dollar a man earns in the same job and with the same education. This is a problem that was endemic across all different professions.</p>



<p>The Equal Pay Act of 1963 and the <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/senate-bill/181">Fair Pay Act of 2009 </a>currently protect employees, but those protections are limited. As well as attempting to even out pay, the Paycheck Fairness Act would also seek to bar employers from retaliating against employees who discuss their salaries and to make it easier for women suffering discrimination to bring class action lawsuits against their employers.</p>



<p>If you are concerned about your pay, feel you are being discriminated against, or have any other questions, check out our FAQs page or <a href="/contact-us/">contact us</a> today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>