Supreme Court Hears Critical Argument About Whether Workers Can Sue in Class Actions for Workplace Violations

Gordon Law Group

The Supreme Court of the United States recently heard oral arguments in three landmark employment cases that may fundamentally determine whether employees can collectively challenge mandatory arbitration agreements on a class action basis.

A deep and ongoing Supreme Court class action arbitration divide exists among federal and state courts regarding the legality of mandatory arbitration clauses, workplace class-action waivers, and employee bargaining imbalance. The cases argue whether employers can require workers to sign agreements that both:

  • Block access to courtroom litigation
  • Prevent employees from filing claims on behalf of others similarly affected

The legal conflict raises concerns about fairness, enforceability, employee rights under collective remedies law, and the boundaries of employer-written arbitration contracts.

Employment law perspectives differ sharply between judicial philosophies. Justices like Ruth Bader Ginsburg acknowledged that many employees sign agreements without real negotiation power, often resembling historical unfair labor contracts such as yellow dog agreements or forced waivers, where refusal could cost them their job opportunities.

Conversely, judges like Chief Justice John Roberts take a stricter contractual interpretation, asking whether arbitration clauses and class waivers should be considered universally illegal or evaluated case-by-case based only on statutory conflict with federal arbitration law.

The Supreme Court class action arbitration divide could shift:

  1. Whether arbitration agreements override group lawsuit rights
  2. If employees can seek remedies collectively despite signed waivers
  3. How courts treat power imbalance in employment contract enforcement
  4. How far employers can go in limiting legal recourse at hiring

What employees should know now:

Courts still evaluate public policy fairness and statutory rights

Most arbitration clauses are not automatically illegal

Class-action waivers are under legal challenge, not fully settled

Signing does not always eliminate all legal options

State employment statutes may conflict with federal arbitration enforcement

Read What Judges Say About Us

extraordinary skill displayed in this litigation

Judge Daniel O'Shea

impressive scholarly expertise

Judge Joseph F. Leighton, Jr.

extensive experience and success in the realm of class action lawsuits

Judge Robert C. Cosgrove
Best Lawyers Badge
Best Lawyers Badge
Super Lawyers top 100 Badge
2021 Boston Top Lawyers Badge
Lead Counsel Rated Attorney Badge

Where to Find Us

Boston Office
585 Boylston St

Boston, MA 02116

Contact Us