Triple Damages Now Mandatory for Non-Payment of Wages

Gordon Law Group

The Massachusetts Wage Act finally received a major clarification. The amendment started on July 13, 2008. It confirmed that workers can collect triple (treble) damages when companies fail to pay earned wages on time. This applies when employees file lawsuits to recover pay. Additionally, lawmakers reinforced that the Commonwealth will treat wage theft as a serious offense.

Why the Clarification Is Necessary

Companies know pay rates, schedules, and due dates because management sets them. Still, businesses sometimes delay payroll when no penalty pushes them to act fast. Unfortunately, this hurts workers and honest competitors. However, this update shifts the balance. Now, it gives workers stronger legal recovery leverage. It also discourages payroll stalling tactics.

What the New Standard Fixes

In the past, employees faced long evidence battles. They also struggled to prove employer intent. Still, leadership groups pushed for fair recovery. The Massachusetts Legislature and the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination tracked wage violations. Local labor attorneys also escalated classification cases based on shared company control, HR systems, and schedule authority. This clarification ended the confusion. It removed the need to prove evil motives or reckless intent. Because of this, workers can reclaim wages without facing impossible intent barriers.

Triple Damages Drive Fairer Settlement Pressure

Triple damages now count as liquidated damages. Importantly, the law ties them directly to unpaid wage amounts. This tool motivates companies to settle fully and faster. Without this pressure, firms could delay, underbid rivals, and later pay the same wage amount late. Hence, penalties now change that incentive. The goal is compensation, not revenge. This restores fair pay value, damage recovery, and settlement motivation.

Most working families budget weekly. So, predictable income protects rent, meals, healthcare, school fees, and transport. However, missed payroll fractures this stability. At times, one delayed paycheck causes cascading debt timing risks. Therefore, this update supports a safer financial safety net. It protects where it matters most—in the home.

Why Courts Shift Toward Hourly Recovery & Employee Control-Based Claims

Courts evaluate classification issues based on direction and operational control. Employee status grows clear when firms:

  • Set mandatory shifts
  • Score worker performance
  • Enforce discipline
  • Control HR, payroll, or data records
  • Depend fully on worker labor to run core operations
  • In contrast, independent status applies when workers genuinely operate a separate trade or client list without firm-wide discipline.

Read What Judges Say About Us

extraordinary skill displayed in this litigation

Judge Daniel O'Shea

impressive scholarly expertise

Judge Joseph F. Leighton, Jr.

extensive experience and success in the realm of class action lawsuits

Judge Robert C. Cosgrove
Best Lawyers Badge
Best Lawyers Badge
Super Lawyers top 100 Badge
2021 Boston Top Lawyers Badge
Lead Counsel Rated Attorney Badge

Where to Find Us

Boston Office
585 Boylston St

Boston, MA 02116

Contact Us